{ "ok": false, "model": "wouter-1", "wouter": "Nee.", "reason": "Wouter is on holiday. He told you about this in March.", "wouter_status": "on_holiday", "tokens_read": 0 }

This is just fantastic.

Hilarious. I have subscribed and put it in production already.

One (actual) suggestion - the marquee at the top scrolls a little fast and I can't really read it. Make it a little slower. I asked OpenWouter to do it, but it said nee.

Integration roadmap.

DAY 60 We propose a standing Monday sync. DAY 61 There is no standing Monday sync.

This is going to be a reverse acquisition where Wouter ends up running Stwipe.

> Knowledge cutoff

> None. Wouter is aware of everything and disappointed by most of it.

Here I am, brain the size of a planet and they ask me to take you down to the bridge. Call that job satisfaction? ’Cos I don’t.

Reminds me of this gem: https://theonion.com/tony-womo-out-three-to-four-weeks-with-...

The names reminded me of https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm/pull/1027

> Our Chief Product Officer is four. She saw the headline and screamed. The board interpreted this as a mandate.

Chef's kiss

Reminds me of the "No" Koan[1]

[1] https://www.pacificzen.org/library/starter-kit-for-the-koan-...

Best deal of the century multi-trillion dollar future guaranteed.

Goed gedaan Wouter!

If only they can wope in Johnathan Ross. Liked his interview of Womesh Wanganathan.

haha I read most of this page out aloud in my head and it was even funnier

makes more sense than a lot of prompts i got answered and paid for

We need more QuinnyPigs in Tech.

Jaaaaa Goed gedaan oer!

Godverdomme

> Numbers invented for this slide, in the industry tradition.

Holy shit, I love it.

Now why and how the f-- do you own stwipe.com ?

I am mildly disappointed that a Dutch model experiences 0 hallucinations, as per their invented numbers.

Now on docker

Wat

LOL