23 points by Kevin_Flynn 6 hours ago
•
delichon 4 hours ago
The flying version is a concept car that was announced as "invitation only", meaning not planned to be for sale to the general public. There was no claim that it will be street legal to fly. It can in fact leave the ground under its own power, stay airborne for seconds, and land safely. Where is the lie?
•
ryandvm 34 minutes ago
The lie is that a) it will never actually be produced for sale; and b) there seems to be evidence that it didn't have a full battery - which makes sense given, well, physics.

That people defend these antics is wild. It takes a special kind of sycophant to be lied to and to appreciate it; or I don't know, maybe it's just the regular kind.

•
Kevin_Flynn 3 hours ago
The car did not fly.

It performed a controlled fall.

It then jumped and performed another controlled fall.

For the finale, it farted at the finish line.

They did debunk the myth of the circus being dead.

It was an advertisment for the corporate power of SpaceX and Tesla. That's what I saw. I didn't see any 'saleable products.'

Give us something new Elon, in terms of engineering breakthrus, not just gluing off the shelf lego parts together.

You can do it :|

disclaimer: I'm a customer. I like both companies products. The diving donkey show, not so much.

•
ActionHank 4 hours ago
This is literally what everyone who saw it immediately thought.
•
drcongo 4 hours ago
Sadly not. There were an awful lot of credulous comments in the threads on here.
•
Reubachi 4 hours ago
credulous in the sense that it is an an engineering feat. Caveat, I'm way more a car person than IT person, and dislike Tesla.

Hagerty or some similar channel had a 45m breakdown of the car with a tesla rep, and as a standalone single vehicle that can do what it does, it's a marvel. I really couldn't believe the aero effects and paneling/tightness came from the same company that last year officially "exited the car business" and sold a stainless steel half truck.

That said it's so obviousley a marketing peice/distraction. But I am thinking about the engineers who's saw this as their chance to show that yes, they can design and bring to prototype a car with the fit and finish of a ferrari prototype with the added instanity of a very impractical gas cylinder rocket system.

•
ActionHank 4 hours ago
More and more I am left wondering if billionaires with their own ai farm would be petty enough to use them to drum up support for their products.
•
rwz 2 hours ago
I don't think anybody above 10 years old is seriously expecting to be able to buy the flying version of the car or be able to do thrust-assisted 0-60 on a public road.

This whole video was just 9 minutes of "duh" for me.

I personally don't think we'll ever see this tech in action again. Maybe there will be a couple of billionaire collectors who receive their invite-only thruster cars only to put them in a garage and never touch it again. Maybe there'll be some "Jay Leno's garage" walk-around style youtube video. But I don't think anybody would ever actually seriously let this thing fly in the wild.